Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Academic Articles Awards > Procedure

Dispelling the Perception that Legal Privilege impedes Antitrust Enforcement – The US Experience

Scott D. Hammond, Competition Law International Vol 11 No 2, October 2015

See Scott D. Hammond's resume

Vote for this articleHelp

* Average
** Interesting
*** Good
**** Excellent
***** Must receive an Award!

Please note that the star(s) appearing on the article page before you have voted reflect the status of all votes registered to date.

Readers’ vote will close on February 15, 2016. Readers’ vote will allow you to nominate 1 article for each of the Awards, i.e., 10 Academic articles, 10 Business articles, and the best Soft Laws. The readers’ short-list of Academic and Business Articles will be communicated to the Board together with the 20 articles nominated by the Steering Committees. The Board will decide on the award-winning articles. Results will be announced at the Awards ceremony to take place in Washington DC on the eve of the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting on April 5, 2016.

Click here to read the full article online

My contribution to this article is to share my experience of the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division (‘Antitrust Division’) with legal privilege to dispel the perception that it impedes antitrust enforcement. Having moved to private practice, I cannot speak for the Antitrust Division. However, during my tenure heading the Antitrust Division’s cartel enforcement programme, I saw first-hand and gained a great appreciation for how attorney-client privilege and the work product protection promote compliance and complement enforcement of the US antitrust laws. These protections would produce the same benefits in Japan and would further the interests of all stakeholders in the fair and effective enforcement of the Anti-Monopoly Act in Japan.

Download our brochure