Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Academic Articles Awards > General Antitrust

From Philadelphia National Bank to Too Big to Fail: How Modern Financial Markets Have Outrun Antitrust Law as a Source of Useful Structural Remedies

Donald I. Baker, 80 Antitrust Law Journal No. 2, 2015

See Donald I. Baker's resume

Vote for this articleHelp

* Average
** Interesting
*** Good
**** Excellent
***** Must receive an Award!

Please note that the star(s) appearing on the article page before you have voted reflect the status of all votes registered to date.

Readers’ vote will close on February 15, 2016. Readers’ vote will allow you to nominate 1 article for each of the Awards, i.e., 10 Academic articles, 10 Business articles, and the best Soft Laws. The readers’ short-list of Academic and Business Articles will be communicated to the Board together with the 20 articles nominated by the Steering Committees. The Board will decide on the award-winning articles. Results will be announced at the Awards ceremony to take place in Washington DC on the eve of the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting on April 5, 2016.

In 1963, when the Supreme Court disposed, in a single footnote, of any lingering doubts about whether “banking” was really “commerce” subject to the Sherman and Clayton Acts,1 it opened a large new frontier for antitrust enforcement by the Department of Justice. And we at the DOJ leapt into this cozy, regulated field by bringing far more merger cases against banks and bank holding companies than we brought in any other industry over the next decade. The Philadelphia National Bank (PNB) decision gave us a ringing mandate in the oft-quoted assertion that “[t]he fact that banking is a highly regulated industry critical to the Nation’s welfare makes the play of competition not less important but more so."

Download our brochure