Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Academic Articles Awards > Economics

Private Monitoring, Collusion and the Timing of Information

Fahad Khalil, Jacques Lawarree, and Troy J Scott, The RAND Journal of Economics, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp. 872–890, 2015

See Fahad Khalil's resume See Jacques Lawarree's resume See Troy J. Scott's resume

When a principal’s monitoring information is private (nonverifiable), the agent should be concerned that the principal could misrepresent the information to reduce the agent’s wage or collect a monetary penalty. Restoring credibility may lead to an extreme waste of resources—the so-called burning of money. A more realistic and efficient outcome is feasible when the private information arrives in time to rescale the agent’s effort. Rescaling is more effective than pure monetary penalties because effort has different values to different parties whereas money is equally valuable to all parties. Furthermore, when rescaling is feasible, private monitoring is more efficient than public monitoring subject to collusion because nonmonetary penalties are ineffective to deter collusion.

Download our brochure