Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Business Articles Awards > Private Enforcement

Private enforcement in Australia – an emerging opportunity

Andrew Riordan and James Love, Norton Rose Fulbright Memorandum, October 2015

See Andrew Riordan's resume See James Love's resume

Vote for this articleHelp

* Average
** Interesting
*** Good
**** Excellent
***** Must receive an Award!

Please note that the star(s) appearing on the article page before you have voted reflect the status of all votes registered to date.

Readers’ vote will close on February 15, 2016. Readers’ vote will allow you to nominate 1 article for each of the Awards, i.e., 10 Academic articles, 10 Business articles, and the best Soft Laws. The readers’ short-list of Academic and Business Articles will be communicated to the Board together with the 20 articles nominated by the Steering Committees. The Board will decide on the award-winning articles. Results will be announced at the Awards ceremony to take place in Washington DC on the eve of the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting on April 5, 2016.

Whilst private enforcement action has been available to the victims of competition law infringements since the mid 1970s, Australia’s competition law landscape has traditionally been dominated by public enforcement proceedings.

However, major changes to Australia’s competition laws may be on the horizon with a raft of reforms under review by the Australian Government, including changes which ought to see an emergence of private enforcement in Australia.

In this article, we look at some examples of private enforcement action in Australia, identify some of the potential barriers to private enforcement and explore some of the proposed reforms.

Download our brochure