Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Business Articles Awards > Private Enforcement

The changing landscape of UK cartel litigation

Peter Scott, Mark Simpson, James Flett, Norton Rose Fulbright Memorandum, October 2015

See Mark Simpson's resume See Peter Scott's resume See James Flett's resume

Vote for this articleHelp

* Average
** Interesting
*** Good
**** Excellent
***** Must receive an Award!

Please note that the star(s) appearing on the article page before you have voted reflect the status of all votes registered to date.

Readers’ vote will close on February 15, 2016. Readers’ vote will allow you to nominate 1 article for each of the Awards, i.e., 10 Academic articles, 10 Business articles, and the best Soft Laws. The readers’ short-list of Academic and Business Articles will be communicated to the Board together with the 20 articles nominated by the Steering Committees. The Board will decide on the award-winning articles. Results will be announced at the Awards ceremony to take place in Washington DC on the eve of the ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting on April 5, 2016.

The UK is the forum of choice for some of the largest damages claims arising from cartel conduct in Europe. This article describes how cartel litigation in the UK is currently in something of an interim phase, having moved past a first phase that was characterised by delays caused by procedural issues, but with a distinct new era around the corner with the implementation of the Consumer Rights Act which entered into force from 1 October 2015.1

This article highlights the key strategic decisions in bringing and defending claims by reference to four interrelated arenas: the regulator’s investigation; the likely appeal of any infringement decision to the EU’s courts; the High Court procedure; and the settlement process.

Download our brochure